LeRoy's Lemma

Cube Root of Plato?**

1. Cube
2. Root [ow]
3. of  ***

[ ! ]  [!]

(~) p.27 $13 ii. *

* 5-26-15

(links inserted footnotes continued) NFRY
"This in fact is true of plane figures in geometry; but some spherical figures exhibit, notwithstanding a complete internal agreement, such a contrast in their external relation, that the one figure cannot possibly be put in the place of the other."

This segment is the tangent to the ying/yang/Jung of TOW.
** links inserted
*** associated/related words added.
Math pun of sorts:  cube root of 27 is 3.
[ OW ] :  Steven Clemons: On Olbermann [difficulties]

 

Value Posted.

Pro Log:

I must preface, that I caught a lot of the reaction along with snippets of the speech on MSNBC(which was no bed of roses) before I finally listened to the whole speech while writing (interspersed) the second[*] blog post. Somewhere embedded is the video of Mathews with Ron Reagan Jr. where he is bating Karen Finney. So if you run into it, let me know, but I have an index of priority links, the first being the speech[**], which I think is the most important in history. Yet. OK, maybe not so melodramatically but solemnly considered to be in the balance. Meaning: if these pragmatic and incremental tactics are not strategically implemented, there will be a much harder and dangerous, Rube Goldberg, if not broken with a peace busted, Rubic's Cube. Any opposition must address all the concerns of our puzzle, not that some pressure will not be welcomed to tweak the navigator and the crew.]

(the preceding was actual preface in an email)

Who let the dogs out!
Not exactly three part harmony *** on Capitol Hill.

[* reference to an email including ]

[**] {Index of priority links: "Speech", "no vapid" (General Eaton), Pakistan, Maddow (1:15-1:52)}

[Last reference: Center for American Progress ]
[*** actual lyrics are in a different Three Dog Night song, speaking of the Radio, I must find the second hour of the Norman Goldman Show to get Ray McGovern's take on things.]
*** Rubic's Cube in this piece(smashed or missing), but Rubric's Cube in this realm mythication.

Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)

[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]

It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.

Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.

footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]

[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.

[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]

1-9-14 Kant we all  ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches?  No.  Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics?  Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant.  Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics.  Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee.  (G'Ribble Label?)

Try Angle Nation

RSN: cant or

I, J, K street?

Gender Clash
More Mon knee? TP

O W [?]  ...

(tout court [!])  6-25-14
Let alone Green's function 4yeah or phoyer, let alone faux-yer. Bin go.
Ruff FP:
orbit - Anachronism , Scratch That...
"many body" not exactly , hertz
Pars'n any:  A.  Thumbs/GOP and OWS , B. Anachronism , C. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, D. A Tail of Caution , E. I Told You So., F. Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (re:legend - sc)

Real Mythication

Senator Franken on Republican entitlement.
Nicole Sanders on Lieberman Bill
Charge of the Dense Brigade
Speaking of Tools...
Seeking shelter, does not a tool make.*
I mean, why not credit it with conservationist or materialist ideology?(the octopus)(recycled or supply side economics)
(UP - date)

(Get err done, or is it ARRR?)

(Pulled from draft:
A portion of making a point? as inspired sources...
John Podesta
Doctrine airy
Hopenhagen?
What a drag.)**

REAL MYTHICATION (title finally added above).
Hmmm.

The Real Rubric's Cube? Or from the mouth of Rubes or other caricatures?

*sequentially eventually I beg to differ: a punderstanding of evolution
** or scroll over links
[Nightmare before Mainstreet?]

Battle of Amendments?

Or Balance of Fittest ?

Related Flak [?]

[Reboot Reading List]
[No compunction or qualms with how others connect the dots ?]

This in no way* intends to imply that the amendments have any intention of being in any heirarchy, priority or clause.**

* nor weigh ?   [a Lean Forward, b  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (b), c, d Ghost of X-mas Passed. , e One Heckuva Day. , f, g It's Obama's Turn , h The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh! , i Social Darwinism 2.0[!] , j Now this is the ticket. , k Weird Google of the Day. , l Speaking of Bowls, m X & Y Chromo Somes]
** (s.c.) scroll click[Maslow, clause(b.s.), wits]
[Reading List, RE:VIEWING, Reading List (UC) ]

[Face the Music ! ? ! (cheer/leader/ship/?)]

Buy In?

[[UPDATE 12-23-09:
Salon v. Huffington*
Throwing in the towel of bipartisanship and/or getting it together?
Who needs Republicans when the Democrats have two wings?
(On the other hand: High Stakes Poker [**] anyone?)

* Wonk Room actually, but the sentiment counts and change happens. ]]
[**Thanks to Thom Hartmann ]

[Resume original post]
The Senate Hurdle? The Federal Option.
[OurFuture.org]

Optimistic Sense?
Real Mythication
UPDATES
Saving the spot *
Get 'er done
Hiatus of Thought
Rubric's Cube...
[12-22-09: Think Progress Hopenhagen, (FT, WaPo, NYTimes) OurFuture.org Bumbling Economy?]

FOOTNOTES PAGE DECEMBER 2013

Begun 12-3-13

12-1-13:(sc) math problem un4m~ulated. (NFRY)
12-2-13(cont.) Too Random... Righty? 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (the point ?)
[4 the record : 3 squared? ]
12-3-13: Parallel [!] un-Pink Floyd, He- /^\ , van-NO JOKE, ven-Rough Philosophy, Cry- / Star Chamber Revisited, river- / creek ? 

rtd 12-3-13

Retrieved from draft 12-13-13
State Theory <- heading // lede -> and duality // trinity/body  Headings and^ Leadership*. (dynamics)
  ^    of/or 8:  Snooze/Dream(4,6) *prof(it)C? (7,8) Bane or Right?  [Not to blog both ends against the middle.]
Don’t celebrate yet!: Why Boehner won’t really ditch the right-wing nutjobs. /  The Christian right wants civilization to collapse / (3/5) Head ~ Lead Paul Krugman: The GOP’s austerity agenda is winning / My critics have “income envy”: Ed Schultz unloads after backlash to his union quote 
Dual / nd: When will the media learn? Conservatives are not “centrists”! / 3 essential (and ignored) questions about Detroit’s bankruptcy  Try Ad of Caution?  (not fully read yet) (anachronistic construction) (duel conflation)~ (bc: bubble critics)  OW Hegel ~ Liebniz [!]
RTD


12-23-13 (4) A.  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., B. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! c. Snooze Alarm d. Tony Baloney e. WWW Wisconsin Lesson? f. We Need Ed  g, What's good for the goose...

12-27-13 
12-28-13 1 Was Wittgenstein Right? or behind [?^] 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 9  // 10 / 11
^ insert a - h
12-29-13 - Original 5 links.  A. Frank O File? B. Pi cAP Delta rOW(USC) C. 1. Inverse Reality?,  2.(i), 3. Fair and Balanced..., D. Wittgenstein , E. Re-Mix  ///
12-30  F.rough- 1. Punderous Ponderings , 2. State of Politics , 3. A Revolution? 4.Un-Exceptionalism 5.  , G.notes^ -1. 2.Heuristic Concurrence and  3.My Respects to Those who Celebrate. (re-search*) , H.math^^ - 1. Too Random... , 2., 3.Bury the lede?, 4. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)] . *(under the case of not fully read yet, but back to math... why now 16?  too cubed by two? Speculation that the 5th perspective is from apart too pun? The three-body problem regards intitial circumstances from within or without. R 1st 3 models different than recently added.  The pow#r of i(V)?

File of sorts.

Not exactly the proverbial round file, but I have resorted to NFRY's or QCON's where often the T'wain shall meet.  Stop.

1. Not fully read yet.
2. Quick comment on news.
4. wane
3. tan gent
a. b. c. d. (...) thru ?
a2 Dark Matter, Anti-Matter (...) r2
a3 Mitt's BO*Son , d3 Bring It On!

The point being, that there is reading between the lines and there is lede or ship.

1.g Try Lemmings, j Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, m ANN,  h2 Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.
2. Lemon Ship

Then there is (sc)[scroll/or/click] of share 'n angle or* lemon plank.
A, Breaking Trojan Goat* Leaks B.Fight On!, C, D Leaking Intelligence, E. Odyssey Dawn, F. Seconds, G. Roger That "V"
* of/or

Mean while ...
3. a. Future Bubble?, b. Skipping Geometry, c. Un-Hyper Links, d. Bricks and stones, e. Unspinning Charlotte!,

...Rubi'O's** Cube? Oops, I mean Walker's run.

** OW

[ThinkProgress,  OurFuture.Com ]

F~N~8~ing

Footnotes
Nietzsche~/~2(un)Cube
Page Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.
Re:L8'in to math and geometry. 
What has four faces and eight sides and six edges? 
...
Too Cubed!
Or WeGeMaTron?
C'P/P'C? (from D'sID)
The Other Table! Fact Check ~/~ Interview
C'@ L? ~ Mbeds!
(posted 3-5-15)

Shilling / Schiller

What the FN~?
HeyDigger? knot/naut!


Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

Try Angle Nation

Noam Chom/sky:

Owl of Minerva /

Speculative Physics

(~)  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

(^)

Heuristic Concurrence and

My Respects to Those who Celebrate.

More on the geometrics of everything.

A. but in no particular order or to be arranged later...there is the tetrahedron of will as I reconstructed a platonic book report.
B.  My reference to math being next to Godliness.
C.  the deconstruction of a famous formula into x,y,z & t
D ...may the cable guy be with you or hoist on our own Picard.
Enough charting of points, here is an article that may be relative.

Some prospecting.  Math, geometry and theories are all constructs.  Uniting constructs is problematic.
I have a hunch that some of them are the problem as much as the key.

PS.  I had not even gotten into the piece maybe as far as locality and unitarity, let alone "constructs."

ahhhh..."Rube Goldberg" that's the ticket[!]
or Rubrics Cube or tetrahedron.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

~the problem of one and infinities and paradoxes

~~~a problem with the tetrahedron of will in my physics, psychology, philosophy and politics...
see "bundles of tetrahedrons" and a different rendering.

image credit
Pardon the live-blogging/reading but I better get some zzz's.
bookmark Quest for Quantum Gravity or the Jinga of time and space.

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO NOVEMBER 2014

11-17-14  (b.s.)  Jump in the Lakoff  Contempt for Courage , B. Navigation 3.0 , Bermuda , The %th EleFont , Go Jump in the Lakoff[!] , F. Work in Progress , (G-fp)  Papa mmmm ow ow!


                                                                                                                                              11-14-14 Not Just ... (aip) (b.s.): An Inconvenient Platonics? but co-op(T)ed! (fn/fp)correction, but further(b.s.)platonics: Econ(explitive), Light Speed, Rat Races Van Mices? (fp3-erization),
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle? , Plane Platonics , 9-18-13 FP$, Rock, Paper, Scissor? , 4A , (~) To all those who served..., (~) The best laid plans..., (~) Aye of Newt, (~) Chart , (~) Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. , D&R Tan ya?

F(ootnotes) P(age)3 A(ugust) 2013

8-5-13: $knot=  a. Take Back the American Dream, b. WHERE DO YOU FALL...OWS!
A for August need to ReVamp Heading {c b low}

8-9-13 NOW "The O-Genduh"? {adjust(ing) time stamp(s) and headings here}

8-20-13 More to till [!] ?

8-22-13  [...] NOW UOB "Buffalo is on the move!" Teddy Bull and Pit Bull

8-26-13 Kant+we+all A. Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., B., C.Between Iraq and a Hard Work!, D. Connecting the Dots, E.Our Story, F. THE COUNCIL OF NICE [!]  Note: Sarcasm insert updates earlier nexus or should read as Irony. Not to mention NOW and ealier M-bed.  (The "I" word, Knot independence.)"

8-28-13:  A Black and White(correct link) Chat. 1. A., b. / 2. A. B. / 3. a., B., c. If Only It Were Black and White., D., e.(s.c.)  / 4. A. (...)  Ctrl F a. The New Compendium,  b., c. Not to make light..., d. Monkey Business , e. The Hope'd4 Campaign , f.  Not to Follow-Up... , g. The other ground game..., h. What Obama can't say., i. Checking In: , j. k.Churned Media,  l.Co-Op-Ed , M. On any given day? , n.Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? , o. "so you don't have to" , p.That's the Ticket[!] , q.The Groove Back  r.Who are they calling , s. t. The Place for Politics Note: Ctrl F not adequately locating/bolding the ticket(b.s.).

Egg/Road/Sky*

or crossing the chicken...^

 

The Tikkun(MayJune'09)

knot Rubicon.

* a triad
^ a try ad ?


W. (a)Pre-post-or-us? , (b)  "OFF A CLIFF" , (c) Humpty Dumpty... , (d) Tear Down That Wall! , (e.)High8US , (f)  Bottom Line? , (g)  Revolutionary Hospitals (and Back Again) , (h) On the wall verses on the table. , (i) On the wall verses on the table. (j)Humpty Dumpty (k) Hold your head up Paul Krugman!  (l) A Plea to Congress  (m) Between the charges   [USC:dumpty]
X. (a) Humpty Dumpty... , (b) "they trust themselves" , (c)  The Clash  (d)  The Most Dangerous Game ,
=====
Y. (i) Odyssey Dawn , (ii)  Crossing the Rubicon (iii) CON TEXT / CON SCIENCE ABOUT THE PROCESS!
Z.  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

BTW: I wonder Y the only link that is not a~ (sc)anomaly is (iii)?  Not because I let YouSC. Not to mention the spin on W(m) 
Snap! Big JC on Ed! (*^.)**

** [New Page](.) [Carpe Diem!](d/e) [D or R][Mixed News: colors and letters]  / PC of Mini-Me ?
{note to test that anomaly of (b.s.)/(sc)}   

C#PO(correction) C3PO

[FOOTNOTES (#3) NOVEMBER 2012]
Scroll down for most recent.

[Posted 11-8-12] F'n 3 point oh?
Footnotes on Tan Gents. 
C 4* congress?
Conn Sciousness?
* 4 mat review ?
Not?

11-30-12 "the boat we are all in."
UNDERCONSTRUCTION or_RE_DE_: PROGRESS and CONGRESS
"all"= (b.s.)"golden + rule"
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/05/golden-rule-in-progress.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/09/running-on-what-rhetorical.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-me-worry.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/09/1st-thing-that-went-wrong.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/04/tetra-heed-ron.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/04/inconvenient-segue.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/01/martin-luther-king-jr-day.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/hi-ate-us.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/ideology.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/05/justice.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/01/on-level.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2010/06/just-to-clarify.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/05/taking-bear-by-horns.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/11/mess-age-is-message.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/10/whatsoever-man-soweth.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/09/stuart-smally-anyone.html
(b.s.) works in* mysterious** ways.
* a, b, c, d, e
** a, d, c, x, e, y (alpha-ibid-zed and why!)
Note: only covered the "all" & "in", these are the links that works at this time, and may leave "boat"(cats + dogs) and "we" 4 later.***
*** actually that is all there R : The (b.s.) of "we" is "4" now and "works"!!!!!!

11-9-12 (fn) too  much ? [!]
Labels Ouch "cap that" M-beds.(CONN Sciousness) Jung, Nietzsche, Maslow (Transition of Sorts)

11-10-12: UNqEd/reCap(l5) =/aka line five not LXV but that is pound too Roman. i.e. Ibid. of sorts.
Furhter editors note:
Fup='d "follow up"
There are presently 3 footnotes for November w/hope to keep it that way.
This 4mat was begun in September I think.
There are presently 11 links with 33 [CtrlF]"Ibid"'s@(b.s.)"Ibid" as follows,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/12/flow-of-conscience.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/08/inet.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/08/republicans-cuts-and-runs.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/too-cubed-viii.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/politics-is-local.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/out-foxed.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/footnotes-september-2012.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/ideology.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/02/report-from-sabbatical.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/12/rubrics-cube-and-rhetorical.html